Menu
Washington DC
DC Dispensaries
DC Weed Reviews
DC Medical Reviews
How to Buy Weed in DC
I-71 Information
History of Legal Weed in DC
DC Medical Marijuana Guide
Virginia
Find the BEST weed in...
Nebraska Supreme Court Hears Challenge to Medical Cannabis Petition Signatures
Dec 9, 2025
Source:
TG Branfalt
Ganjapreneur
The Nebraska Supreme Court last week heard arguments about the validity of
signatures on the two medical cannabis petitions approved by voters last
fall, KOLN reports. In the lawsuit, Former state Sen. John Kuehn, Secretary
of State Bob Evnen, and Attorney General Mike Hilgers argue that tens of
thousands of signatures required to put the issue to voters were fraudulent
and improperly notarized and are, therefore, invalid.
A lower court has already tossed the lawsuit, but Andrew La Grone, an
attorney for the appellants argued that “When there are bad acts related to
the affidavit…the value of the verification is destroyed and the petition
must fall unless the genuineness of the signature is affirmatively shown.”
In a Facebook post ahead of the hearing, Nebraskans for Medical Marijuana,
which led the ballot campaign, said “People don’t try this hard to destroy
something that doesn’t matter.”
Nebraskans for Medical Marijuana has fought for one simple truth: sick and
suffering people deserve compassion, relief, and dignity. And because our
work is making real change, the opposition has done everything in its power
to tear it down. But their attacks only prove our impact. … They cannot
erase the 540,000 Nebraskans who stood with us. They cannot silence the
parents, veterans, and patients whose only relief comes from cannabis. They
cannot undo the will of the voters. Every lawsuit, every delay, every
political maneuver is confirmation that we are winning.” — Nebraskans for
Medical Marijuana in a Facebook post.
During the arguments, La Grone contended that “Allowing the district
court’s opinion to stand would allow merely two bad actors to fraudulently
place any measure on the ballot so long as they both invoke the Fifth
Amendment.”
The court could rule that the petitioners must prove that the
already-validated signatures are valid or it could toss entirely the
legality of the petition and the medical cannabis reforms.
A decision in the case is expected in the next few weeks.







